OOOD Media

Visit the media pages for photo galleries and to watch our live videos. You'll also find our SoundCloud pages and weblinks that we like.

Stooodio Mastering

Colin OOOD provides professional analogue/digital audio services to record labels and artists worldwide. Check the Mastering menu for more information.

OOOD Releases

In the OOOD Music menu you will find everything to do with our music - discography, reviews, a track player and our live sets

News & Updates

Get the latest OOOD news and updates, info about selected upcoming events and the news about the website.

O.O.O.D. (aka Out OF OUR DEPTH)Psychedelic Dance Music Project from the UK

Formed in Oxford in 1994 by Colin Bennun, Nigel Bradbury and Steve Callaghan, currently based in Bristol. Since 2001 the lineup has mainly consisted of Colin, Steve, Ryokan Potier and Ramsay Melhuish. Read more..

Colin BennunSound Designer & Engineer | Producer | Keyboard Player

Colin started making electronic music in 1986 and had his first trance release in 1994. A member of OOOD from the beginning, he plays keys and mixes the band on stage, and also offers a mastering service.  Read more..

Stephen CallaghanSound Designer | Producer | DJ | Guitarist

Steve is a co-founder of OOOD and has been producing dance music since 1988. He can usually be seen on stage playing either guitar or keyboards. You can find some of his DJ mixes on this site.. Read more..

Ramsay MelhuishSound Designer | DJ

Rama has been DJing since 1991 and joined OOOD in 2000 after a long time as part of the crew. On stage he's in charge of playback, samples and freaky kaosscilations. Check his mixes out on the DJ Mixes page. Read more..

Ryokan PotierSound Designer | Producer | Drummer

Ryo joined OOOD in 2000 after meeting the band in 1995, and has been DJing since he was 17; check out his mixes. He is a classically-trained drummer and violin player. On stage you'll see him behind the drums. Read more..


"The Shwing EP" is out now on Phantasm Records and available from Beatport!

The ShwingBuy it HERE!

"Here we go, Phantasm Records Psychedelic is back again! This time we are proud to present an EP from the legendary act OOOD, from the UK. We really don't need any more introduction for this uber-psychedelic band; they have 20 years experience on the road and they released their first track with us in 1996! OOOD is the ultimate combination of 4 psychedelic mental heads; the Shwing EP exudes a retrodelic feeling and a unique analog style, and includes three mind-blowing top notch tracks. Question: what you can expect from this release? Answer: analog masters, producing Goa sounds and quality Class A night-time psychedelic music! Two original stompers from OOOD plus an out-of-this-world remix from MANMADEMAN. Its fast, driving psychedelic synths are just the ticket for a night time set! The classic old school influences, Goa feelings and a compulsive drive which never lets the dancefloor down make these tunes a unique experience - this is a "MUST HAVE" release for all the Retrodelic new- and old-school psychedelic lovers! Tune In!"


OOOD's 5th album "You Think You Are" out now on Vertigo Records!

You think you are

Listen and buy the album HERE!

"We are very happy to announce that a brand new album by the English fab four OOOD (not the Beatles as you may have thought) called 'You Think You Are' will be released this autumn on Vertigo  Records. We have to say that we have been big fans of OOOD's music for the last few years and we are now really proud to have them on board. Another tasty dish for real psychedelic gourmands is ready for the hungry ears of their fans around the world. Expect a quality multi-genre fusion made in the best traditions of underground dance music – embracing many influences whilst remaining true to the spirit of the trancefloor. Vertigo will also be managing international bookings for OOOD as well as for Voice Of Cod and all four members' DJ sets.

Last but not least, Colin Bennun and the Stooodio are now signed as official mastering partner for Vertigo Records, which means that most of our upcoming releases will be in the careful hands of this living production guru."

 

Connect

OOOD FacebookOOOD Reverb Nation OOOD YoutubeOOOD Soundcloud

Beatport

Tweets



Bristol

design by Design by Suloo

©2012-2014 by OOOD || All Rights Reserved

NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.

By continuing to use this website you express your consent to its use of cookies! Learn more

I understand

The EU cookie law (e-Privacy Directive)

The law which applies to how you use cookies and similar technologies for storing information on a user’s equipment such as their computer or mobile device changed on 26 May 2011.

We’ve answered some of your FAQs in a YouTube video, summarising how you can comply and the approach the ICO is taking to enforcement. (Playing YouTube videos sets a cookie.)

 

ICO guidance

Updated in May 2012, our cookies guidance sets out the changes to the cookies law and explains the steps you need to take to ensure you comply.

Download the ICO cookies guidance (pdf)

Our guidance includes additional information about implied consent:

  • Implied consent is a valid form of consent and can be used in the context of compliance with the revised rules on cookies.
  • If you are relying on implied consent you need to be satisfied that your users understand that their actions will result in cookies being set. Without this understanding you do not have their informed consent.
  • You should not rely on the fact that users might have read a privacy policy that is perhaps hard to find or difficult to understand.
  • In some circumstances, for example where you are collecting sensitive personal data such as health information, you might feel that explicit consent is more appropriate.

Find out more about the action we're taking on cookies

European data protection authorities opinion

In June 2012, European data protection authorities (as part of the Article 29 Working Party) adopted an opinion which clarifies that some cookie uses might be exempt from the requirement to gain consent:

  • Some cookies can be exempted from informed consent under certain conditions if they are not used for additional purposes. These cookies include cookies used to keep track of a user’s input when filling online forms or as a shopping cart, also known as session-id cookies, multimedia player session cookies and user interface customisation cookies, eg language preference cookies to remember the language selected by the user.
  • First party analytics cookies are not likely to create a privacy risk if websites provide clear information about the cookies to users and privacy safeguards, eg a user friendly mechanism to opt out from any data collection and where they ensure that identifiable information is anonymised.

Cookies and personal data

Regulation 6 covers the use of electronic communications networks to store information, eg using cookies, or gain access to information stored in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user.

Although devices which process personal data give rise to greater privacy and security implications than those which process data from which the individual cannot be identified, the Regulations apply to all uses of such devices, not just those involving the processing of personal data.

Where the use of a cookie type device does involve the processing of personal data, service providers will need to make sure they comply with the additional requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the Act). This includes the requirements of the third data protection principle which states that data controllers must not process personal data that is excessive. Where personal data is collected, the data controller should consider the extent to which that data can be effectively processed anonymously. This is likely to be particularly relevant where the data is to be processed for a purpose other than the provision of the service directly requested by the user, for example, counting visitors to a website.

Confidentiality of communications and spyware

It should be remembered that the intention behind this Regulation is also to reflect concerns about the use of covert surveillance mechanisms online. Here, we are not referring to the collection of data in the context of conducting legitimate business online but the fact that so-called spyware can enter a terminal without the knowledge of the subscriber or user to gain access to information, store information or trace the activities of the user and that such activities often have a criminal purpose behind them.

Information to be provided

Cookies or similar devices must not be used unless the subscriber or user of the relevant terminal equipment:

(a) is provided with clear and comprehensive information about the purposes of the storage of, or access to, that information; and

(b) has given his or her consent.

The Regulations are not prescriptive about the sort of information that should be provided, but the text should be sufficiently full and intelligible to allow individuals to clearly understand the potential consequences of allowing storage and access to the information collected by the device should they wish to do so. This is comparable with the transparency requirements of the first data protection principle.

The Regulations state that once a person has used such a device to store or access data in the terminal equipment of a user or subscriber, that person will not be required to provide the information described and obtain consent (and discussed above) on subsequent occasions, as long as they met these requirements initially. Although the Regulations do not require the relevant information to be provided on each occasion, they do not prevent this.

Responsibility for providing the information and obtaining consent

The Regulations do not define who should be responsible for providing the information and obtaining consent. Where a person operates an online service and any use of a cookie type device will be for their purposes only, it is clear that that person will be responsible for complying with this Regulation.

Exemptions from the right to refuse a cookie

The Regulations specify that service providers should not have to provide the information and obtain consent where that device is to be used:

  • for the sole purpose of carrying out or facilitating the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network; or
  • where such storage or access is strictly necessary to provide an information society service requested by the subscriber or user.

In defining an 'information society service' the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 refer to 'any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by means of electronic equipment for the processing (including digital compression) and storage of data, and at the individual request of a recipient of a service'.

The term 'strictly necessary' means that such storage of or access to information should be essential, rather than reasonably necessary, for this exemption to apply. However, it will also be restricted to what is essential to provide the service requested by the user, rather than what might be essential for any other uses the service provider might wish to make of that data. It will also include what is required to comply with any other legislation the service provider might be subject to, for example, the security requirements of the seventh data protection principle.

Where the use of a cookie type device is deemed 'important' rather than 'strictly necessary', those collecting the information are still obliged to provide information about the device to the potential service recipient and obtain consent.

Wishes of subscribers and users

Regulation 6 states that consent for the cookie type device should be obtained from the subscriber or user but it does not specify whose wishes should take precedence if they are different.

There may well be cases where a subscriber, for example, an employer, provides an employee with a terminal at work along with access to certain services to carry out a particular task, where to effectively complete the task depends on using a cookie type device. In these cases, it would not seem unreasonable for the employer’s wishes to take precedence.

However, it also seems likely that there will be circumstances where a user’s wish should take precedence. To continue the above example, an employer’s wish to accept such a device should not take precedence where this will involve the unwarranted collection of personal data of that employee.